Friday, June 08, 2007

Freaks rejoice

We too can now empty our wallets on some carbon goodness. Sad thing is I'd have to switch to Campy to get longer than 175 cranks in order to get down to an 89cm saddle height. I'm currently between 90 and 90.5 :( Anyone know why Shimano (or anyone other than Campy) isn't on the longer crank bandwagon?

Oh, and to steal one from the Gewilli rant machine, share the farkin bike paths and sidewalks people. If I have to make sure I pass you safely going 20mph on my bike or even 8mph on my feet, you should have to make sure that you:
1) Know which side of the path you're supposed to be on
2) Pay attention to where the hell you're going
3) Shut off the friggin deathpod so I don't look like a dick by having to scream "On your left!"
4) Don't waddle your asses 4 wide across the whole path at 1/4 mile an hour and act annoyed when someone is coming the other way or goes around you from behind.

Ok, I'm done.

3 comments:

gewilli said...

HOLY F*CK....

61 top tube? SCHWEEEET

perfect...

heck i could even ride the 62 sized frame...

wait...

are they giving them out to tall riders?

trackrich said...

Yah don't you wish... free Madones to the first 100 6'5"+ freaks who sign up... Still haven't seen a price list... curious where the "low end" ones will fall.

gewilli said...

not low enough for me...

hell frame only will be prohibitive (for me... )

not sure i want a Trek. The geometry for the Trek's are a bit boring, neutral and blah... okay for everything not great at anything...

but then...

i've only been TOLD that by people who ride em or rode em...